studio statement
Designing the Architecture of Public Works (Health Care Facilities, Educational, Cultural, Recreational, Public Spaces, etc.) implies a series of challenges in both developed and developing countries. In developing countries, and particularly in Latin America, public facilities design may pursue extra challenges in addition to the purely functional endeavors: they should not only be clearly affordable and sustainable in durable and reasonable economic terms, but should become an instrument for transforming individuals, through their current needs, into a condensed social community, providing a broad, sustainable and meaningful sense of public healing.
Physical but also social healing starts with the Public having access to this universal status, regardless of their economic, social, political, or ethnic conditions. This sense of public healing begins the domino effect: individuals are healed by professionals (doctors, teachers, trainers) and technology (buildings, equipment), but at a larger scale, entire societal groups are healed because the facilities extend a sense of belonging, of place. As a public congregator, the facility becomes part of the people, pertains to the people, belongs to the people, and reactivates the local idiosyncrasies and relevance of the social bond, thus cultivating the civic citizenship.
The Public Facility performs and renders in its design the urban drama of public space, articulating the formal/institutional with the informal public life in the city. Social invisibilities, local lore, that which has been forgotten, that wisdom which has managed to survive, the marginalized, the alienated, denied, those not officially recognized or those confronted by homogenization as a condition for their integration, could rise in the design as a form of particular and patient counterpoint to the abstract machine of the formal city, uniting members in a dynamic, common healed body.
Public healing works is a sort of significant cure that begins the transformation of sick individuals into a stronger, more reconciled, healed community. It is a chain reaction, an epidemic that spreads the healing process. Each member heals another one reverting social invisibility into the manifestation of Public, a demonstration of built dignity and inclusion becoming a social celebration, a public display of affection from the city to the people, for collective engagement, conquest, and realization.
From a building to an infrastructure or a city fragment, in the form of public acts of architecture, it provides the real, comprehensive construct to help localized urban constrictions meet occasional social emergences, offering to precisely unfold in the situation an embedded but at the same time expansive and fertile architectural/urban release; a rich fabric of complex textures able to reconcile and surpass the simplistic formal/informal contradiction, inexorably immersed in the real grounds of the urban complex becomes a powerful tool for public enhancement of the city.
The rapid emerging of contemporary socio-cultural issues and human challenges are immersing the old stable urban contexts of the big metropolis in the vortex on new dynamics (Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Mexico City, etc.): the case of street kids, extreme poverty, cartoneros, favelas, violence and crime, infant prostitution, drugs dealing, aids, etc., is the real political ground for Public Architecture and Urbanism acting effectively on the platform of societal transformation, happening right in front of everybody's eyes.
assignments
1 st Assignment: Testing of Materials | Information
Manipulation and organization of the matter. Working with different materials to reveal its capacities, qualities and potencies, generating a powerful encounter of the present conditions in a given field of work and in the production of a base material for the project. Finding differences or similarities, to produce derivations, to manipulate or to conduct a project within its own conditions and needs. How the social, economic, and political conditions get recorded in the matter. Working with systematic operations.
1.1 -Abstract local scale: manipulation of the material itself testing its resistance, power, capacity and quality without the collapse thereof
1.2 -Combination and relationships of components: produce sequences, evolutions and variations of what was produced in scale 01
1.3 -Direct the combinations and relations of components according to the following organizations: punctual, central, linear, superficial, volumetric, etc.
2 nd Assignment: Territorialization Detecting Information | Site Location
Survey the field detecting the present differences. Recognize and register – do not represent – all the possible differences in the place allocated to each group. The registration of differences will be carried out with the material produced the previous class, transforming it in accordance with the specificities that are being detected.
2.2 - Respond to situations with flexibility
2.3 -Take advantage of fortuitous circumstances
2.4 -Find sense in contradictory or ambiguous messages
2.5 -Recognize the relative importance of the different elements of a situation
2.6 -Find similarities among various situations, despite the differences that may separate them
2.7 -Discover the differences among various situations, despite the similarities that may link them
2.8 -Synthesize new concepts on the basis of old concepts that are taken and reorganized / replaced in new ways.
3 rd Assignment: Spatial Consolidation
3.1 -Project ExtentExtended Site Plan and site considerations, territorial information derived from Assign. 2
3.2 -Project Expanse Intentioned specific Site Plan, Sections, Elevations drawings, expanding into a secondary site
3.3 -Modified Site: Specific Site Plan, Sections, Elevations drawings, actualizing (applying and transfiguring) 3.1 into/from 3.2: Site master texturing (abstract, site qualities)
3.4 -Spatial Consolidation: Determining of buildable solids/landscaped areas (concrete) within master texturing, actualizing (applying and transfiguring) Assign. 1 through 3.3, both in primary and secondary sites, Plan, Sections, Elevations, 3D drawings, physical model
4 th Assignments: Programming Consolidation
4.1 -Profiling of Social Public Uses: Determining of social matter; select and develop from Shelter, Health, Recreation, and Education uses (2 to 4 of them)
4.2 -Programming Consolidation: Final configuration of social landscapes, conflicts and reconciliation of territories of public ness.
5 th Studio Assignment: Building Consolidation
5.1 -Actualize 2 building fragments, elements or systems detected during the visits (Brazil and Argentina) of the chosen building and another one opposite or distant to it in the Modified Territories (3.3). In this first approach, you do not need to adjust to the definitive uses. Individual-by two assignment
5.2 -Actualize with: Spatial Consolidation (3.4), Profiling of Social Public Uses (4.1) and Programming Consolidation (4.2)
6 th Studio Assignment: Building (& Landscape) Material Determinations
6.1 -Actualize the previous Building Consolidation (5.1 Building fragments & 5.2 Building uses) with:
1- Structural Systems
able to tie and re-actualize the previous Modified Territories (3.3)
6.2 -Actualize Structural Systems with other topic Material Determinations series:
2- External & Internal Landscapes3- Enclosure & Apertures
4- Circulations & Movements<br>
5- Infrastructure & Furniture
6- Roofs & Ceilings
7- Floors
8- Levels & Stair cases, vertical circulation
9- Natural & Artificial Light
10- Public & Private space appropriation
11- Textures & Finishing
12- Access & Doors (main & secondary)
7 th Studio Assignment: Thesis Statement on Architecture of Public Kids
Considering your semester living experience in Buenos Aires, assignments 1 through 6 and their respective team outcomes, field trips, and Theory/Systems class, elaborate around/max 500 words (theoretic framework, conceptual fundamentals, thoughtful discussion) around (but not limited to) the following issues, all in support of what your project is trying to demonstrate architecturally :
7.1 -Title (Synthesis of Thesis Statement)
7.2 -Public-ness in urban Buenos Aires
7.3 -Public Kids (Chicos de la Calle) / Cartoneros
7.4 -Public Architecture and Urbanism
7.5 -THE ARCHITECTURE OF PUBLIC KIDS
7.6 –Conclusions
graduate seminar - latin american architecture Coordination: Prof. Claudio Vekstein, BRAZIL: Architecture of the Public City List of Topics: List of Buildings:
|
| 6th year students | ||
![]() |
> brian ballard | |
![]() |
> brian bowers | |
![]() |
> carolyn chamberlain | |
![]() |
> benjamin collins | |
![]() |
> alexis flores | |
![]() |
> helene gregoire | |
![]() |
> joanna hopkins | |
![]() |
> noah lewkowits | |
![]() |
> leah morgan | |
![]() |
> janette navarro | |
![]() |
> daniel noonan | |
![]() |
> alisha rompre | |
| 4th year students | ||
![]() |
> shawn beaird | |
![]() |
> dusty bodrero | |
| > jaime collins | ||
![]() |
> christopher cordell | |
| > molly eagen | ||
![]() |
> aldo estrada | |
![]() |
> adam mcdonald | |
![]() |
> jacob ortwein | |
![]() |
> alexander perkins | |
| > emily roush | ||
![]() |
> t. cody turnquist | |
![]() |
> saori yamane | |
| buenos aires students | ||
| > emiliano da conceicao | ||
| > mario gagliano | ||
| > martin huberman | ||
| > rosario talevi | ||
school of architecture & landscape architecture / arizona state universtity
study abroad program / buenos aires / fall 2006